Publication Ethics

The primary Aims: LEX ETHICA (Journal of Legal Ethics and Contemporary Analysis) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that aims to be a forum for the publication of scientific works in the field of legal science, with a focus on encouraging interdisciplinary studies that connect International Law, State Administrative Law, and Public Policy. This journal is committed to presenting analysis that addresses contemporary challenges faced by Indonesian and global society, through the use of both traditional and modern research methodologies. LEX ETHICA (Legal Ethics and Contemporary Analysis) follows the guidelines set out by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and Peraturan Kepala LIPI Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Kode Etika Publikasi Ilmiah in all aspects of publication ethics. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor-in-chief, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer, and the publisher.

DUTIES oF AUTHORS
Authors who submit manuscripts to LEX ETHICA (Legal Ethics and Contemporary Analysis) warrant the following aspects:
The manuscript reflects original work and should not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. The manuscript does not include derogatory, defamatory or unlawful statements; Authors should appropriately cite and quote any influential publication or work of other authors.

Reporting Standards
A submitted manuscript should be original and the authors ensure that the manuscript has never been published previously in any journal. Data of the research ought to be represented literally in the article. A manuscript ought to include adequate detail and references to allow others to replicate the study.

Originality
Authors submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Legal Ethics and Contemporary Analysis (LEX ETHICA) must ensure that the submitted work is entirely original. Any quotations, paraphrases, or other references to words or sentences from literature or other sources must be accompanied by appropriate attribution and citation in accordance with the author's guidelines.

Multiple Publication
Authors are prohibited from submitting the same manuscript concurrently to more than one journal, as this is unethical practice and unacceptable in scientific publications. Repeated publication is permitted only if the manuscript presents a new, substantially different analysis, perspective, or comparison, even if it uses the same existing data.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Authors are required to provide proper acknowledgement of the work of others used or referenced in their writing. Any publications that have significantly influenced the substance and direction of the reported research must be clearly acknowledged in the bibliography and in-text citations.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should only be granted to individuals who have made significant contributions to the design, execution, analysis, or interpretation of the research. Others who contributed to the research but do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed as contributors.
The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all authors who meet the criteria for authorship are properly listed in the manuscript and for ensuring that all authors agree on the final version submitted.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All sources of financial support related to the research must be transparently disclosed. Each author must declare any relevant and significant potential or significant conflicts of interest, whether financial or non-financial, that may influence the design, execution, analysis, or interpretation of the research results.

Author Guidelines for COPE
Based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, authors and editors are expected to understand and comply with the following procedures:

1.  Plagiarism in Submitted Manuscripts
Guidelines for steps to take if plagiarism is suspected in a manuscript under review.

2.  Plagiarism in Published Manuscripts
Procedures for handling if indications of plagiarism are found in a published manuscript.

3.  Redundant Publication in Submitted Manuscripts
Procedures for handling allegations of redundant publication before the manuscript is published.

4.  Redundant Publication in Published Manuscripts
Steps for correction or retraction if redundant publication is discovered after publication.

5.  Authorship Disputes
Specific guidelines for handling authorship disputes, including guidance for new researchers, are available on the COPE website.

Editor's of Duties
In general, the editor is responsible for supporting authors and readers in improving the quality of journal content and is fully responsible for all articles published in LEX ETHICA (Legal Ethics and Contemporary Analysis). The editor is also responsible for paying particular attention to addressing potential legal violations and violations of intellectual property rights conventions.

Publication Decisions
The editor is responsible for determining whether an article is suitable for publication based on the quality of its content, relevance to the journal's objectives, and suitability for the journal's scope. In making this decision, the editor may consult with other editors or expert reviewers. Once an article is accepted and published, it cannot be retracted unless it is found to contain plagiarism, unjustified findings, redundancy, or significant errors. For further information, please refer to the Retraction Guidelines issued by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Equality (Fairness)
Editors will assess and evaluate each manuscript objectively based on its quality and intellectual contribution, without regard to non-academic factors such as race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political views of the authors.

Confidentiality
Editors and editorial staff are required to maintain the confidentiality of all information related to submitted manuscripts. This information may only be shared with authorized parties, such as the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. The identities of authors and reviewers must also remain confidential to maintain the integrity of the peer review process.
Related COPE Editorial Guidelines:

·      Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors

·      COPE Guidelines: Sharing of Information Among Editors-in-Chief Regarding Possible Misconduct

·      COPE Guidelines: Text Recycling

·      COPE Ethical Editing for New Editors

DUTIES oF REVIEWERS
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review plays a crucial role in assisting editors in making informed editorial decisions. Through constructive communication with authors, the review process also contributes to improving the quality and refinement of submitted manuscripts.

Timeliness
Any selected reviewer who feels inadequately qualified to review the research presented in a manuscript, or knows that he or she will be unable to complete the review in a timely manner, must promptly notify the editor and excuse himself or herself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shared, shown, or discussed with others without the express written permission of the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews must be conducted objectively and professionally. Personal criticism of the author is discouraged. Reviewers must express their opinions clearly, supported by reasons and arguments supported by relevant evidence.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers are responsible for identifying relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, finding, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by an appropriate and relevant citation.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
Confidential information or ideas obtained during the peer review process must be kept confidential and must not be used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have any potential conflicts of interest, whether resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or affiliations with any of the authors, companies, or institutions.
Related COPE Reviewer Guidelines:

·      COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers

·      What to Do If the Editor Suspects a Reviewer Has Copied an Author's Ideas or Data

DUTIES oF PUBLISHER
In general, publishers have the primary responsibility for protecting authors' copyright and intellectual property rights in works published in their journals, as well as ensuring respect for privacy and the independence of the editorial process.
Related COPE Publisher Guidelines: Policies and Related Links

·      COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers

·      COPE Transparency and Best Practices in Scholarly Publishing